Using a Limited Liability Company to Operate a Pennsylvania Family Farm Business
April 2001, Prepared by Jeff Feirick, (J.D. May 2001)
Under the Direction and Supervision of Professor Lance Cole
I. WHAT IS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY?
LLC Compared to Other Business Forms
(Figure 1-1)
|
Sole Proprietorship - A single farmer owns and operates a farm. Advantage: Disadvantage: |
General Partnership -Two or more farmers work together to make a profit. Advantage: Disadvantage: |
Limited Partnership - At least one farmer who manages the business and one or more farm investors who do not actively participate in the farm business. Advantage: Disadvantage: |
Corporation - A farmer forms a corporation by: Advantage: Disadvantage: |
|
- one or more farmers operate their business with the same protection from personal liability as shareholders in a corporation yet retain the advantages of a partnership. Advantages: Disadvantages: |
A. Purpose
B. Forming an LLC
C. LLC Name
D. LLC Management
E. Members
F. Membership Rights
II. WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES OF USING A FARM
LLC?
A. Decreased Farmer Liability
B. Simplicity of Operation
C. LLC Protection of Farm Assets in an Economic Downturn
D. Income Tax Advantage
E. Dissolving an LLC
F. LLC Members Can Pledge or Sell their Ownership Interests in the LLC.
G. The LLC May Solicit Additional Member Contributions and Bank Loans
H. The LLC Can Assume the Risk of New Business Ventures.
III. WHAT ARE SOME LIMITATIONS WHEN USING A
FARM LLC?
A. Liability For Personal Acts and Omissions Not Protected by an LLC
B. Banks May Not Always Loan an LLC Money without Personal Guarantees
IV. Conclusion
The Agricultural Law Research and Education Center ("the Center") is located
in Carlisle Pennsylvania and is a joint undertaking of Penn State's Dickinson
School of Law and College of Agricultural Sciences. The Center is funded in
part by a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.
The Center provides:
The Center cannot provide legal advice.
While the Center cannot and does not provide legal advice, its staff of second and third year law school students, under the direction and supervision of the Director, Professor Christine H. Kellett, helps individuals find answers to legal questions by referring the person to a local agricultural law attorney, pertinent statutes, regulations, cases and explanatory law review articles.
Contacting the Center:
For more information contact the Center at:
1. Statute:
Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company Law, (15 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. §§ 8901 et seq.,
2. Law Review Articles:
BANKRUPTCY ISSUES IN PARTNERSHIP AND LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CASES,
Joyce A. Dixon, and T. Randall Wright, American Legal Institute-American Bar
Association Course of Study, May 13, 1999. (Citation: SD83 ALI-ABA 189)
This outline will summarize the current bankruptcy law as it relates to partnerships and LLC's, highlight common issues about which practitioners should be aware, and discuss recent cases which relate to these issues.
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES AS AN ALTERNATIVE CHOICE OF ENTITY FOR
FARMING AND RANCHING OPERATIONS IN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Kenneth Esch and Pamela Spaccarotella, Creighton Law Review, Dec. 1994 (Citation:
28 Creighton L. Rev. 19)
This article will analyze the choice of entity with respect to Nebraska farming and ranching operations in light of the recent developments concerning LLC's. The article will first discuss choice of entity considerations with respect to business planning for farming and/or ranching operations. The article will then discuss choice of entity with respect to estate planning. Lastly, the article will discuss the methods by which a current farming or ranching operation can convert to a LLC and minimize the tax consequences upon conversion.
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES BEFORE AND AFTER THE JANUARY 1997 IRS "CHECK-THE-BOX"
REGULATIONS: CHOICE OF ENTITY AND TAXATION CONSIDERATIONS,
Carol J. Miller, Douglas J. March, and Jack E. Karns, Northern Kentucky Law
Review, Spring 1998. (Citation: 25 N. Ky. L. Rev. 585)
This article compares Limited Liability Companies to other traditional and emerging forms of business structures and assesses salient tax considerations attendant to the choice of entity question, taking into consideration the effect of the January 1997 IRS check-the-box rules.
NEW BUSINESS OPTIONS IN PENNSYLVANIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE PENNSYLVANIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AND LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT OF 1994, Hannah L. Thompson, U. of Pittsburgh Law Review, Fall 1995. (Citation: 57 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 129)
This comment discusses the general characteristics of LLC's and specifically addresses the provisions of the Pennsylvania LLC Act. Finally, this comment compares the Pennsylvania LLC and LLP Acts with other business entities currently existing in Pennsylvania and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each business form. [Note that this article was written before the I.R.S. adopted the "Check the Box" regulations and before Pennsylvania law was changed to permit LLCs to be taxed as a partnership rather than a corporation.]
TEN LIMITATIONS TO PONDER ON FARM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. and L. Leon Geyer, Drake Journal of Agricultural Law, Spring, 1999, (Cite as: 4 Drake J. Agric. L. 197)
This article outlines the ten biggest issues raised by operation of the family farm in a limited liability company. The authors also suggest procedures to minimize the problems that may arise in these situations. However, this article does not intend to comprehensively examine all aspects of limited liability companies or the choice of entity. The questions do provide food for thought for the conscientious practitioner.